On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > > On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > All this does not change the fact that installing a graft and 'git gc > > > --prune'ing gets rid of the old history. D'oh. > > > > So will rebasing and --prune'ing, or pulling a rebased branch and > > --prune'ing. Git already gives you _plenty_ of different ropes to hang > > yourself with. The question is whether adding yet another one is worth > > it. > > But that is not the question here. The question here is: are users > allowed to hang _others_? I say: no. Well, to a certain degree (and depending on your level of paranoia), you're always responsible for the code entering your own repo, and you could always set up a hook disallowing ".gitgrafts" (or whatever it would be called) from entering your repo. But taking this (and everything else that's been said) into account, I totally agree with you that adding this feature would open up a _massive_ can of worms. EOD ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
