Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> So in summary there appear to be the following possibilities:
>
> CHUNK_MISSING
> CHUNK_TOO_SMALL
> CHUNK_OK
> CHUNK_TOO_BIG_ALIGNED
> CHUNK_TOO_BIG_MISALIGNED
On second thought, it appears that CHUNK_TOO_SMALL has three cases:
(1) chunk_size < record_size
(2) chunk_size >= record_size, but chunk_size < record_size * record_nr
and decreasing record_nr can make chunk_size "fit"
(3) chunk_size >= record_size, but chunk_size < record_size * record_nr
and decreasing record_nr cannot make chunk_size "fit"
where (2) and (3) are just like the *_(MIS)ALIGNED cases above when
chunk_size is too big.
My default position is that these additional cases might need to be
treated differently, although maybe it's overkill also.
Thanks.
