Re: [PATCH 1/2] t9902: verify that completion does not print anything

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Patrick,

On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:08:21AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >
> > > The Bash completion script must not print anything to either stdout or
> > > stderr. Instead, it is only expected to populate certain variables.
> > > Tighten our `test_completion ()` test helper to verify this requirement.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  t/t9902-completion.sh | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/t/t9902-completion.sh b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > index aa9a614de3..78cb93bea7 100755
> > > --- a/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > +++ b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > @@ -87,9 +87,11 @@ test_completion ()
> > >  	else
> > >  		sed -e 's/Z$//' |sort >expected
> > >  	fi &&
> > > -	run_completion "$1" &&
> > > +	run_completion "$1" >"$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output 2>&1 &&
> > >  	sort out >out_sorted &&
> > > -	test_cmp expected out_sorted
> > > +	test_cmp expected out_sorted &&
> > > +	test_must_be_empty "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output &&
> >
> > It seems that this fails CI on macOS, most likely because we're running
> > with `set -x` and that output somehow ends up in `output`, see e.g. here:
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/7496790359/job/20409405194#step:4:1880
> >
> >   [...]
> >   ++ test_completion 'git switch '
> >   ++ test 1 -gt 1
> >   ++ sed -e 's/Z$//'
> >   ++ sort
> >   ++ run_completion 'git switch '
> >   ++ sort out
> >   ++ test_cmp expected out_sorted
> >   ++ test 2 -ne 2
> >   ++ eval 'diff -u' '"$@"'
> >   +++ diff -u expected out_sorted
> >   ++ test_must_be_empty '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'
> >   ++ test 1 -ne 1
> >   ++ test_path_is_file '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'
> >   ++ test 1 -ne 1
> >   ++ test -f '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'
> >   ++ test -s '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'
> >   ++ echo ''\''/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'\'' is not empty, it contains:'
> >   '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output' is not empty, it contains:
> >   ++ cat '/Users/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9902-completion/output'
> >   ++ local -a COMPREPLY _words
> >   ++ local _cword
> >   [...]
> >
> > Maybe this is running in Dash and therefore `BASH_XTRACEFD=4` in
> > `test-lib.sh` has not the intended effect?
>
> Meh, thanks for the heads up. Another test gap in GitLab CI which I'm
> going to address soon via a new macOS job.
>
> In any case, Dash indeed does not honor the above envvar.

Hmm. I had a closer look and now I am thoroughly confused. In
`t/lib-bash.exe`, we make sure that this test is run in Bash. And indeed,
when I call

  BASH=1 POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 TEST_SHELL_PATH=/bin/dash dash t9902-completion.sh -iVx

I am greeted by this error message:

  git-completion.bash: Syntax error: "(" unexpected (expecting "fi")

So something else must be going on here.

> I also could not find any alternate solutions to redirect the tracing
> output. So for all I can see there are a few ways to handle this:
>
>   - `set -x` and then restore the previous value after having called
>     `run_completion`.
>
>   - Filter the output so that any line starting with "${PS4}" gets
>     removed.
>
>   - Don't test for this bug.
>
> Not sure which way to go, but the first alternative feels a bit more
> sensible to me. It does remove the ability to see what's going on in the
> completion script though in case one wants to debug it.

Personally, I would go for option 2, filtering out the xtrace output. This
here seems to work:

-- snip --
diff --git a/t/t9902-completion.sh b/t/t9902-completion.sh
index b14ae4de14e..23cd1cd9508 100755
--- a/t/t9902-completion.sh
+++ b/t/t9902-completion.sh
@@ -87,11 +87,14 @@ test_completion ()
 	else
 		sed -e 's/Z$//' |sort >expected
 	fi &&
+	PS4=+ &&
 	run_completion "$1" >"$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output 2>&1 &&
+	sed "/^+/{:1;s/'[^']*'//g;/'/{N;b1};d}" \
+		<"$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output >"$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output.x &&
+	test_must_be_empty "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output.x &&
+	rm "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output.x &&
 	sort out >out_sorted &&
-	test_cmp expected out_sorted &&
-	test_must_be_empty "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output &&
-	rm "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/output
+	test_cmp expected out_sorted
 }

 # Test __gitcomp.
-- snap --

It is a bit ugly, in particular the `sed` expression (which is a bit
complex because the `output` file can contain multi-line strings enclosed
in single-quotes), and we could probably lose the `"$TRASH_DIRECTORY"/`
part to improve the reading experience somewhat.

But my main concern is: Why does this happen in the first place? If we are
running with Bash, why does `BASH_XTRACEFD` to work as intended here and
makes it necessary to filter out the traced commands?

Ciao,
Johannes





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux