Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:52:30PM +0000, Justin Tobler via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Some tests set up reference locks by directly creating the lockfile. >> While this works for the files reference backend, reftable reference >> locks operate differently and are incompatible with this approach. >> Generalize reference locking by preparing a reference transaction. > > As with the first patch, I think we could use d/f conflicts to get the > same effect. Perhaps something like this: Thanks for a great alternative. I agree that avoiding fifo indeed is a better way to go.
