Hi, On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Peter Karlsson wrote: > Johannes Schindelin: > > > Why should it? This would contradict the whole "a commit sha1 hashes > > the commit, and by inference the _whole_ history" principle. > > Does it? Yes! Of course! If what you want becomes possible, I could make an evil change in history long gone, and slip it by you. You could not even see the history which changed. > Why can't the grafts file itself be committed to the repository and live > in the history? You can do that already. But you have to ask the people at the other end to actually apply the graft. > Well, yeah, the SHA1 hashing is one of Git's main strengths, but it also > opens up some weaknesses. If you really think that, I doubt you understood the issues at hand. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
