Re: [PATCH 4/6] t1419: mark test suite as files-backend specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

On just this (non-technical) part...

>> > file, but not for loose references. Consequentially, all callers must
>> > still filter emitted refs with those exclude patterns.
>> 
>> s/Consequentially/Consequently/
>
> Hum. I had the last time when you mentioned the in mind while writing
> the commit message, but seemingly misremembered the outcome. So I now
> looked things up in a dictionary, and both words seem to be used in
> equivalent ways. As a non-native speaker, could you maybe elaborate a
> bit to help me out? :)

As a non-native, I often find this

  https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=consequentially,consequently&hl=en

fairly useful.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux