On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > Having something functionally similar to > > cg-clone git://foo.tld/bar.git#blue > > would save a few steps -- and some potential confusion -- for projects > using GIT. I do agree with that "functionally similar", I just disagree with the syntax. The thing is, we don't want a single branch name. Not for clone, not for fetch, not for pull, and not for push. Yes, a single branch may be one common case, but it's definitely not the only one, and it's fundamentally the wrong thing to use as a definition of syntax. It's also the wrong thing to do for local stuff. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
