Hey Patrick,
On December 21, 2023 12:48:12 p.m. GMT+01:00, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:30:02PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>> Hey list,
>>
>> For years, I wanted (tried, but time) to run the mirror for git on gitlab.
>> Actually, the original idea was to run a docker container ([0] 10k+ pulls
>> :p)
>>
>> I initially set this up via docker build containers, where docker hub would
>> pull my mirror of the git repo. My mirror, because I added a Dockerfile
>> which was enough for docker to do its trick. I was planning (time ..) on
>> submitting this upstream to the list, but never did. Because of me not doing
>> that, I had to manually (I was even too lazy to script it) rebase the
>> branch. Docker then did some changes to their business, where the docker
>> builds where not possible anymore.
>>
>> So then I figured, I'll do the same on gitlab and push it to the docker hub.
>> Thus I setup a mirror on gitlab [1], with the idea to work there on it.
>>
>> Again, I never got around to finalize this work, mostly because the docker
>> container 'just worked' for pretty much everything. After all, git is very
>> stable overal.
>>
>> So very interestingly, last month commit 0e3b67e2aa25edb ("ci: add support
>> for GitLab CI") landed, which started to trigger pipeline jobs!
>>
>> Sadly, this only worked for 3 builds, as that's when the minutes ran out :)
>>
>> So one, I would very much like to offer the registered names (cause they are
>> pretty nice in name) to here, so people can use and find it.
>
>Not to throw a wrench into this, but are you aware of the official
>GitLab mirror at https://gitlab.com/git-vcs/git? I myself wasn't aware
>of this mirror for a rather long time.
Not a wrench at all, and no, I didn't know. How old is it though :p could be that git-vcs was created cause I owned gitscm :)
I had chosen gitscm to match the official site, git-scm.org. the hyphen I left out because afaik it wasn't allowed on docker hub.
>
>I also wondered whether we want to have https://gitlab.com/git/git as we
>do on GitHub. I don't think anybody registered it, but it is blocked
>from being registered as far as I can tell. Maybe we block the namespace
>out of caution, I dunno. I can certainly check in with our SREs in case
>it is something the Git project would like to own.
Yeah couldn't figure out who it was either ... hence gitscm.
Sadly gitlab doesn't support aliases :) I'm more then happy to hand over the space. Whatever name is decided to be best.
>
>> Two, hopefully get Patrick Steinhardt to help out to get unlimited minutes
>> and storage on the repo :)
>
>I'm sure we can do something here, but I'd rather aim to do this for the
>official mirror which currently is the one I mentioned above. If the
>project is interested in running builds on GitLab then I'm happy to
>coordinate.
>
>Also Cc Ævar, who is the current owner of the mirror. Would it be
>possible to add myself as a second owner to the project? This might help
>setting up the CI infrastructure. But please, if anybody disagrees with
>me being added as an owner here I encourage you to say so.
>
>> Three, see what the opinion of people here is on this. I'll do the work to
>> get the dockerfile (now containerfile, we're inclusive after all) merged,
>> and the CI file updated to create, store (and push to docker hub) the
>> generated containers.
>
>I don't really have much of an opinion here and will leave it to others
>to discuss.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Patrick
>
>PS: As most other folks I'll be OOO during holidays, so I may only
> answer sporadically.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Olliver
>>
>> [0]: https://hub.docker.com/r/gitscm/git
>> [1]: https://gitlab.com/gitscm/git
>>
>> P.S. I'm not subscribed, so please keep me in the CC :)
