Re: [PATCH 5/8] reftable/stack: perform auto-compaction with transactional interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 8:07 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Whenever updating references or reflog entries in the reftable stack, we
> > need to add a new table to the stack, thus growing the stack's length by
> ..
> 
> bug is correctly identified, but can't the fix remove the
> 
>          if (!st->disable_auto_compact)
>                 return reftable_stack_auto_compact(st);
> 
> fragment from reftable_stack_add? reftable_addition_commit eventually
> calls reftable_addition_commit.

"calls reftable_stack_add" you probably mean here. But yes, you're
right. As this patch series has already been merged to `next` I can roll
this cleanup into my second patch series that addresses issues with the
reftable library [1]. Does that work for you?

[1]: http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqr0jgsn9g.fsf@gitster.g/T/#t

Patrick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux