Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for the comprehensive commit message, I agree that we'd be > better off avoiding adding a fallback. The patch looks good, I did > wonder if we really need to covert all of these functions for a > test-balloon but the patch is still pretty small overall. I do have to wonder, though, if we want to be a bit more careful than just blindly trusting the platform (i.e. <stdbool.h> might exist and __STDC_VERSION__ may say C99, but under the hood their implementation may be buggy and coerce the result of an assignment of 2 to be different from assigning true). In any case, this is a good starting place. Let's queue it, see what happens, and then think about longer-term plans. Thanks.
