Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] t5574: test porcelain output of atomic fetch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Nit: you could also do `for opt in "--atomic" ""` directly to get rid of
>> this case statement. Not sure whether this is worth a reroll though,
>> probably not.
>
> Yes, your code is much simpler.

Yup, thanks for careful and helpful reviews, Patrick, on both
patches.  And of course, thanks, Jiang, for working on them.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux