Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Without digging into the code, I had just assumed that flipped_block was > used as an array index. But it really is a boolean, so I actually think > "flipped_block = !flipped_block" would probably be the most clear (but > IMHO not really worth the churn). ;-) > I don't even know that we'd need much of a weather-balloon patch. I > think it would be valid to do: > > #ifndef bool > #define bool int > > to handle pre-C99 compilers (if there even are any these days). Of > course we probably need some conditional magic to try to "#include > <stdbool.h>" for the actual C99. I guess we could assume C99 by default > and then add NO_STDBOOL as an escape hatch if anybody complains. Sounds good.
