> > Actually, subtree strategy was designed to allow merging back > and forth. But the result, as it _is_ a merge, will not omit > any commit from the history from both branches. > > Can git-log be more clever so that it can recognize a subtree merge and show only logs related to the subtree? Another suggestion is that the commit msg for subtree merge should be more accurate such as " Merge branch master of <repos> into direcotry <dir> of branch <branch>" -- franky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
