Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> writes: > git push now allows you pushing a couple of branches that have > advanced, while ignoring all branches that have no local changes, > but are lagging behind their matching remote refs. This is done > without reporting errors. > > Thanks to Junio C. Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> for suggesting to > report in the summary that refs have been ignored. I do not think this is a good idea at all. Furthermore, I never suggested anything about summary. You are robbing the information from the pusher which ones are pushed and which ones are left behind. It simply is insane to make this strange rule 10/10 introduces the default behaviour. It is too specific to a particular workflow (that is, working with a shared central repository, having many locally tracking branches that are not often used and become stale, and working on only things to completion between pushes). I think we could live with an optional behaviour, in addition to the current "matching refs" behaviour, that is "matching refs, ignoring strict ancestors", though, but I doubt it is worth the addition. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
