Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> writes: > Pushing a short refname used to create a new ref on on the > remote side if it did not yet exist. If you specified the wrong > branch accidentally it was created. A safety valve that pushes > only existing branches may help to avoid errors. On the other hand, if you specified a wrong branch that exists on the remote end accidentally, it still was pushed. Do we want to have a new "--i-really-want-to-push" option to make it safer? I do not think so. Why should a new branch be treated any differently? Will drop 1/10 and 2/10 for now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
