Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] faster inexact rename handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff King wrote:
>
>   - no improvement on smaller datasets. Running "git-whatchanged -M
>     --raw -l0" on the linux-2.6 repo takes about the same time with the
>     old and new code (presumably the algorithmic savings of the new code
>     are lost in a higher constant factor, so when n is small, it is a
>     wash).

Have you compared the results? IOW, does it find the *same* renames?

I'm a bit worried about the fact that you just pick a single (arbitrary) 
src/dst per fingerprint. Yes, it should be limited, but that seems to be a 
bit too *extremely* limited. But if it gives the same results in practice, 
maybe nobody cares?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux