Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Thanks for digging up this link. Upon reading the problem report, I > felt certain that we had seen this issue reported previously and that > patches had been proposed, but I was unable to find the conversation > (despite having taken part in it). I am surprised that I did not remember that old discussion at all, and I am doubly surprised that I still do not, even though I clearly recognise my writing in the thread. > I agree, also, that this two-patch series is simple to digest. OK.
