Am 17.11.23 um 14:25 schrieb Johannes Schindelin: > Hi, > > the idea of migrating https://git-scm.com/ from a Rails app to a static > site has been discussed several times on this list in the past. > > Thanks to the heroic, multi-year efforts of Matt Burke, Victoria Dye and > Matthias Aßhauer, there is now a Pull Request, ready for review: > https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/1804 > > This Pull Request is not for the faint of heart, mainly because of the > sheer amount of generated pages that are committed to the repository (such > as the book, the manual pages, etc, a design decision necessary to run > this as a static website). > > These pages are generated by GitHub workflows that are intended to run on > a schedule, and the scripts that generate them are part of the Pull > Request. For that reason, I do not consider it necessary to review those > generated pages, those reviews have been done in the upstream sources from > which the pages were generated. > > At this point, the patches are fairly robust and I am mainly hoping for > help with verifying that the static site works as intended, that existing > links will continue to work with the new site (essentially, find obscure > references to the existing website, then insert `git.github.io/` in the > URL and verify that it works as intended). > > To that end, I deployed this branch to GitHub Pages so that anyone > interested (hopefully many!) can have a look at > https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/ and compare to the existing > https://git-scm.com/. When a transition to static pages happens, an important aspect is that external links that point into git-scm.com must not be invalidated. There are many such links in Stackoverflow answers, for example. I checked one link: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase#Documentation/git-rebase.txt--r https://git.github.io/git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase#Documentation/git-rebase.txt--r and it is looking very good. Thank you! I assume that keeping links working is not just a happy accident, but part of the plan. -- Hannes
