On 2023.11.14 08:55, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I do have to wonder, though, as somebody who did not follow the > > unit-test topic closely: why are the unit tests totally separate from > > the rest of the suite? I would think we'd want them run from one or more > > t/t*.sh scripts. That would make bugs like this impossible, but also: > > > > 1. They'd be run via "make test", so developers don't have to remember > > to run them separately. > > > > 2. They can be run in parallel with all of the other tests when using > > "prove -j", etc. > > Very good points. Josh? In short, the last time I tried to add something to CI, it was not well received, so I've been perhaps overly cautious in keeping the unit-tests well-separated from other targets. But I can send a follow-up patch to fold them into `make test`. Or would you prefer that I send a v11 of js/doc-unit-tests instead?
