Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Should we default GIT_COMMIT_GRAPH_PARANOIA to "0"? Yes, some operations > might miss a breakage, but that is true of so much of Git. For day to > day commands we generally assume that the repository is not corrupted, > and avoid looking at any data we can. Other commands (like "commit-graph > verify", but maybe others) would probably want to be more careful > (either by checking this case explicitly, or by enabling the paranoia > flag themselves). I am obviously fine with that direction, as that was exactly the stance I took when we discussed the topic on "rev-list --missing" ;-) Patrick? Karthik?
