Øystein Walle wrote: > Hi Victoria, > > Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Update the 'for-each-ref' builtin documentation to clarify that refs >> "omitted" by --omit-empty are still counted toward the limit specified >> by --count. The use of the term "omit" would otherwise be somewhat >> ambiguous and could incorrectly be construed as excluding empty refs >> entirely (i.e. not counting them towards the total ref count). > > I implemented --omit-empty and I completely overlooked --count! > > (If I were to do it all over again I probably would have implemented it > so that so-called omitted refs did not count towards the total. It makes > sense to me since e.g. `git log -3 -- git.c` prints the three most > recent commits that touch git.c regardless of how many commits were > walked in the process.) Since the interaction isn't clearly defined at the moment, we could probably still update it to work like you're describing here. I'm happy to drop this patch and implement your recommendation in a follow-up series. Let me know what you think! > > This is a good and welcome clarification. > > Acked-by: Øystein Walle <oystwa@xxxxxxxxx>
