Re: [PATCH 7/9] ref-filter.c: filter & format refs in the same callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 01:25:59AM +0000, Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Update 'filter_and_format_refs()' to try to perform ref filtering &
> formatting in a single ref iteration, without an intermediate 'struct
> ref_array'. This can only be done if no operations need to be performed on a
> pre-filtered array; specifically, if the refs are
> 
> - filtered on reachability,
> - sorted, or
> - formatted with ahead-behind information
> 
> they cannot be filtered & formatted in the same iteration. In that case,
> fall back on the current filter-then-sort-then-format flow.
> 
> This optimization substantially improves memory usage due to no longer
> storing a ref array in memory. In some cases, it also dramatically reduces
> runtime (e.g. 'git for-each-ref --no-sort --count=1', which no longer loads
> all refs into a 'struct ref_array' to printing only the first ref).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  ref-filter.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index ff00ab4b8d8..384cf1595ff 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -2863,6 +2863,44 @@ static void free_array_item(struct ref_array_item *item)
>  	free(item);
>  }
>  
> +struct ref_filter_and_format_cbdata {
> +	struct ref_filter *filter;
> +	struct ref_format *format;
> +
> +	struct ref_filter_and_format_internal {
> +		int count;
> +	} internal;
> +};
> +
> +static int filter_and_format_one(const char *refname, const struct object_id *oid, int flag, void *cb_data)
> +{
> +	struct ref_filter_and_format_cbdata *ref_cbdata = cb_data;
> +	struct ref_array_item *ref;
> +	struct strbuf output = STRBUF_INIT, err = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	ref = apply_ref_filter(refname, oid, flag, ref_cbdata->filter);
> +	if (!ref)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (format_ref_array_item(ref, ref_cbdata->format, &output, &err))
> +		die("%s", err.buf);
> +
> +	if (output.len || !ref_cbdata->format->array_opts.omit_empty) {
> +		fwrite(output.buf, 1, output.len, stdout);
> +		putchar('\n');
> +	}
> +
> +	strbuf_release(&output);
> +	strbuf_release(&err);
> +	free_array_item(ref);
> +
> +	if (ref_cbdata->format->array_opts.max_count &&
> +	    ++ref_cbdata->internal.count >= ref_cbdata->format->array_opts.max_count)
> +		return -1;

It feels a bit weird to return a negative value here, which usually
indicates that an error has happened whereas we only use it here to
abort the iteration. But we ignore the return value of
`do_iterate_refs()` anyway, so it doesn't make much of a difference.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* Free all memory allocated for ref_array */
>  void ref_array_clear(struct ref_array *array)
>  {
> @@ -3046,16 +3084,46 @@ int filter_refs(struct ref_array *array, struct ref_filter *filter, unsigned int
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int can_do_iterative_format(struct ref_filter *filter,
> +					  struct ref_sorting *sorting,
> +					  struct ref_format *format)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Refs can be filtered and formatted in the same iteration as long
> +	 * as we aren't filtering on reachability, sorting the results, or
> +	 * including ahead-behind information in the formatted output.
> +	 */

Do we want to format this as a bulleted list so that it's more readily
extensible if we ever need to pay attention to new options here? Also, I
noted that this commit doesn't add any new tests -- do we already
exercise all of these conditions?

More generally, I worry a bit about maintainability of this code snippet
as we need to remember to always update this condition whenever we add a
new option, and this can be quite easy to miss. The performance benefit
might be worth the effort though.

Patrick

> +	return !(filter->reachable_from ||
> +		 filter->unreachable_from ||
> +		 sorting ||
> +		 format->bases.nr);
> +}
> +
>  void filter_and_format_refs(struct ref_filter *filter, unsigned int type,
>  			    struct ref_sorting *sorting,
>  			    struct ref_format *format)
>  {
> -	struct ref_array array = { 0 };
> -	filter_refs(&array, filter, type);
> -	filter_ahead_behind(the_repository, format, &array);
> -	ref_array_sort(sorting, &array);
> -	print_formatted_ref_array(&array, format);
> -	ref_array_clear(&array);
> +	if (can_do_iterative_format(filter, sorting, format)) {
> +		int save_commit_buffer_orig;
> +		struct ref_filter_and_format_cbdata ref_cbdata = {
> +			.filter = filter,
> +			.format = format,
> +		};
> +
> +		save_commit_buffer_orig = save_commit_buffer;
> +		save_commit_buffer = 0;
> +
> +		do_filter_refs(filter, type, filter_and_format_one, &ref_cbdata);
> +
> +		save_commit_buffer = save_commit_buffer_orig;
> +	} else {
> +		struct ref_array array = { 0 };
> +		filter_refs(&array, filter, type);
> +		filter_ahead_behind(the_repository, format, &array);
> +		ref_array_sort(sorting, &array);
> +		print_formatted_ref_array(&array, format);
> +		ref_array_clear(&array);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int compare_detached_head(struct ref_array_item *a, struct ref_array_item *b)
> -- 
> gitgitgadget
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux