Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ah sorry, I over-edited my cover letter and accidentally removed the > explanation of what this patch does! Yes - the new behavior is that > '--no-sort' (assuming there are no subsequent --sort=<something> options) > will completely skip sorting the filtered refs. Makes sense. And the way to countermand "--no-sort" that appears earlier on the command line to revert to the default sort order is "--sort" that uses "refname" as the sort key, which is also nice.
