Re: BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just reporting that I ran into this again, this time with some info to
help repro, though the issue may be fixed already.

I managed to avoid it by turning off core.splitIndex, so I'd suspected
the setting conflicts with feature.manyFiles.
It could very also be/instead conflict with fsmonitor that I also use,
as mentioned in the similar/related thread:
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqbkhv6dw3.fsf@gitster.g/T/#m13a5ad383f040bb3a6be7641bd04aa20424a274c

Which references a splitindex & fsmonitor bug that's since been
addressed since 2.41:
https://github.com/git/git/commit/3704fed5eae8ca2fa20bcf6adb277ee83b012ce0

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:53 PM Kache Hit <kache.hit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've not been able to successfully repro this after managing to
> recover from it by rebuilding the index:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73044253
>
> I'm sorry I couldn't be more helpful.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 8:59 AM Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kache,
> >
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, Kache Hit wrote:
> >
> > > A thought: the 179457 is reminiscent of something else I did just before this:
> > >
> > > I was doing some "code archeology" and was headlessly checking out
> > > some old SHAs in this large monorepo.
> > > During checkout, it said it was updating 174823 files in total.
> >
> > Do you think it would be possible to whittle this down a bit, and maybe
> > attempt to come up with a reproducible example? Something like what is
> > described in https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve.
> >
> > If all else fails, and you _only_ manage to reproduce it in the original
> > repository, could you at least try to figure out a reliable way to get the
> > Git index into the indicated state (if I were you, I would start off by
> > switching to the pre-rebase revision, deleting `.git/index` and then
> > running `git reset --hard` and then see whether the bug can be
> > reproduced)?
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Johannes
> >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:36 PM Kache Hit <kache.hit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi. Output of git bugreport:
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for filling out a Git bug report!
> > > > Please answer the following questions to help us understand your issue.
> > > >
> > > > What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue)
> > > >
> > > > Wanted to retain git tree structure when pulling latest and rebasing.
> > > > First indication of error was the `rebase -r` of the merge commit
> > > >
> > > > What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior)
> > > >
> > > > successful --rebase-merges rebase of my commits on top of master
> > > >
> > > > What happened instead? (Actual behavior)
> > > >
> > > > ```sh
> > > > ❯ git rebase -r master
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > > zsh: abort      git rebase -r master
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > What's different between what you expected and what actually happened?
> > > >
> > > > Anything else you want to add:
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently "stuck" in this state, not sure how to recover or repro:
> > > >
> > > > ```sh
> > > > ❯ git s
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > > error: git died of signal 6
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git log
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git d head~
> > > > error: git died of signal 6
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git log # works
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git status
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > > zsh: abort      git status
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git commit --amend
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > > zsh: abort      git commit --amend
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git checkout head
> > > > fatal: Unable to create '/Users/XXXXX/YYYYY/.git/index.lock': File exists.
> > > >
> > > > Another git process seems to be running in this repository, e.g.  #
> > > > All of this was run while git bugreport was running
> > > > an editor opened by 'git commit'. Please make sure all processes
> > > > are terminated then try again. If it still fails, a git process
> > > > may have crashed in this repository earlier:
> > > > remove the file manually to continue.
> > > >
> > > > ❯ rm /Users/XXXXX/YYYYY/.git/index.lock
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git checkout head
> > > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:21: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index
> > > > (179457 > 1040)
> > > > zsh: abort      git checkout head
> > > >
> > > > ❯ git checkout head
> > > > fatal: Unable to create '/Users/XXXXX/YYYYY/.git/index.lock': File exists.
> > > >
> > > > Another git process seems to be running in this repository, e.g.
> > > > an editor opened by 'git commit'. Please make sure all processes
> > > > are terminated then try again. If it still fails, a git process
> > > > may have crashed in this repository earlier:
> > > > remove the file manually to continue.
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please review the rest of the bug report below.
> > > > You can delete any lines you don't wish to share.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [System Info]
> > > > git version:
> > > > git version 2.37.1
> > > > cpu: x86_64
> > > > no commit associated with this build
> > > > sizeof-long: 8
> > > > sizeof-size_t: 8
> > > > shell-path: /bin/sh
> > > > feature: fsmonitor--daemon
> > > > uname: Darwin 20.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.6.0: Tue Feb 22 21:10:41
> > > > PST 2022; root:xnu-7195.141.26~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
> > > > compiler info: clang: 13.0.0 (clang-1300.0.29.30)
> > > > libc info: no libc information available
> > > > $SHELL (typically, interactive shell): /bin/zsh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Enabled Hooks]
> > > > pre-commit
> > > > pre-push
> > >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux