Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Maybe you having a similar reaction a second time makes this smell a bit > more? Not at all. I am perfectly OK with --object-*, not --blob-*, as the end-user facing option name. I however strongly prefer to see our log messages record the thought behind the design accurately in order to help future developers when they wonder what our intention was back when the commit was created. In this case, I want to see that we tell our future selves "even though we named the option 'object', we plan to support blobs and nothing else, at least for now". Thanks.
