Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Subsequent patches will require the ability to add different prefixes >> to different lines (depending on their contents), so make this >> functionality available from outside strbuf.c. > > I do not think it is a good idea to force almost everybody to repeat > themselves. As we can see here, all but just a single caller of > strbuf_add_lines() with this patch pass the same prefix for both > parameters. If we need to make the current strbuf.c:add_lines() > also available to some specific callers, that is fine, but let's > keep the simpler version that almost everybody uses as-is, and give > the more complex and featureful one that is used only by selected > callers a longer and more cumbersome name. > > Thanks. Another practical downside of this patch is that it breaks other in-flight topics that adds new users of strbuf_add_lines(), and that breakage is totally unnecessary.