Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] bloom: changed-path Bloom filters v2 (& sundries)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:22:12PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:27:00PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
> > I'm optimistic that with the amount of careful review that this topic
> > has already received, that this round should do the trick.
>
> Unfortunately, I can't share this optimism.  This series still lacks
> tests exercising the interaction of different versions of Bloom
> filters and split commit graphs, and the one such test that I sent a
> while ago demonstrates that it's still broken.  And it's getting
> worse: back then I didn't send the related test that merged
> commit-graph layers containing different Bloom filter versions,
> because happened to succeed even back then; but, alas, with this
> series even that test fails.

I am very confused here, the tests that you're referring to have been
added to (and pass in) this series. What am I missing here?

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux