Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] bugreport: reject positional arguments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] bugreport: reject positional arguments
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:13:33 -0400
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Emily Shaffer <nasamuffin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sheik <sahibzone@xxxxxxxxx>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20231026182231.3369370-1-nasamuffin@google.com>
References: <20231026155459.2234929-1-nasamuffin@google.com> <20231026182231.3369370-1-nasamuffin@google.com>

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:22 PM <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The test I cribbed from for the newly added one in patch 2 was still
> using test_i18ngrep, and Eric mentioned us not wanting i18ngrep at all
> anymore, so I went ahead and cleaned that up as well.

Thanks for making the various tweaks in response to my review comments.

References:
- [PATCH v3] bugreport: reject positional arguments
  - From: emilyshaffer
- [PATCH v4 0/2] bugreport: reject positional arguments
  - From: emilyshaffer

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] subtree: fix split processing with multiple subtrees present
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] bugreport: include +i in outfile suffix as needed
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 0/2] bugreport: reject positional arguments
Next by thread: [PATCH v4 1/2] t0091-bugreport: stop using i18ngrep
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux