Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I'm inclined to agree with your philosophy. Makes me wonder whether we > should write a Coccinelle rule to catch this. But a quick-and-dirty grep > in our codebase shows that such a rule would cause quite a lot of churn: > > $ git grep BUG\( | wc -l > 677 > $ git grep assert\( | wc -l > 549 > > Probably not worth it. Yeah, we can stick to our usual "do not add new instances, fix them while touching near-by code" pattern for this one, I would say. Thanks.
