On 2023-10-23 23:23, Jacob Stopak wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:59:08PM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 09:04:49PM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > That's exactly why I already wrote that the original author of
> > the table patches, if those would become accepted, should commit
> > in advance to maintaining that as the new git feature.
> >
> that's seems just a wee bit unfair (the bar isn't put that high for
> other features), and it's not realistically enforcable anyway.
Well, it's a bit disruptive new feature, which is also quite extensive
and
can rather easily become obsolete if not maintained in the long run.
Perhaps we should hear Jacob's thoughts about that as well.
I would love to work on implementing this and maintaining it! I spend
too much time doing Git things for no reason anyway so why not? :D
Awesome! Quite frankly, I expected to hear that. :)
But... I could die at the hands of an angry user and then you would
have
to take over, Dragan...
Or I could instead try to help you fending off angry git users? :)
