Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 20/10/2023 23:07, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> broken out of the bigger series, as the aggregation just unnecessarily holds it >>> up. >>> >>> v3: removed "stray" footer. so more of a RESEND than an actual new version. >>> >>> Oswald Buddenhagen (3): >>> rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() >>> rebase: handle --strategy via imply_merge() as well >>> rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down >>> >>> builtin/rebase.c | 44 ++++++++++++++------------------------------ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >> Looking quite straight-forward and I didn't see anythihng >> potentially controversial. > > Yes they look good, thanks Oswald Thanks, both. The topic has already been merged to 'next'.
