Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce -t, --table for status/add commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Please don't get me wrong, I understand your reasoning, but again, it
> all comes down to the two categories described above.  IMHO, the
> second category will likely start turning off the default hints sooner
> than turning the table formatting on.  The first category will choose
> some GUI anyway.

You are not alone in feeling the impedance mismatch between the
intended audience the patch(es) try to help (pointy-clicky GUI
users) and the codebase the patch(es) modify (perhaps spartan
command line interface).  I did wonder why this is not made as a
part of sugarcoating the command line interface with some GUI that
shows what could be added, what has been added, and the stuff in its
"git status" equivalent.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux