Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> writes:
> At least after the successive trimming of enum rebase_type mentioned in
> the previous commit, this code did exactly what imply_merge() does, so
> just call it instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx>
Hmph, I do not recall suggesting it, but the resulting code does
make sense. ;-)
>
> ---
> Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> builtin/rebase.c | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index 44cc1eed12..4a093bb125 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -1490,18 +1490,7 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>
> if (options.strategy) {
> options.strategy = xstrdup(options.strategy);
> - switch (options.type) {
> - case REBASE_APPLY:
> - die(_("--strategy requires --merge or --interactive"));
> - case REBASE_MERGE:
> - /* compatible */
> - break;
> - case REBASE_UNSPECIFIED:
> - options.type = REBASE_MERGE;
> - break;
> - default:
> - BUG("unhandled rebase type (%d)", options.type);
> - }
> + imply_merge(&options, "--strategy");
> }
>
> if (options.root && !options.onto_name)
