Hi, On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On 10/27/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote: > > > > > +mkdir -p work/sub/dir || exit 1 > > > +mv .git work > > > +if test "$1" = --normal; then > > > + say "Normal case" > > > +else > > > + say "Worktree case" > > > +fi > > > +test "$1" = --normal || mv work/.git repo.git || exit 1 > > > + > > > +test "$1" = --normal || export GIT_DIR=$(pwd)/repo.git > > > +export GIT_CONFIG="$(pwd)"/$GIT_DIR/config > > > +test "$1" = --normal || export GIT_WORK_TREE=$(pwd)/work > > > + > > > +cd work/sub || exit 1 > > > > Why don't you put this block into a test_expect_success? And then just > > make a > > > > for mode in normal worktree > > do > > > > ... > > > > done > > > > Hmm? I would like to see this test case in the official git.git. > > Because after normal iteration, the test repository is no longer in > clean state that the second iteration needs. Maybe I should just > create another repo then set parameters properly in test_expect_* Yes, you can do that: test_create_repo other-repo Another option would be that you clean up at the end of the loop. Ciao, Dscho
