Re: why does git set X in LESS env var?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-10-13 15:45, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Fri, 2023-10-13 at 06:43 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
Actually, that would be wrong.  If someone sets $LESS or $PAGER (or
$GIT_PAGER, more specifically), it's up to the utility that invokes
the pager internally not to override the user preferences configured
through these environment variables.  That's how everyone can customize
the pager behavior.

Well, but if its clear that the output would otherwise be garbage (e.g.
because -R is missing).

Well, it's the basic principle of "garbage in, garbage out". If there's something wrong with the contents of the environment variables, that's simply the way the user configured it, and it's only their job to get it right.

In any case right now we have the situation that a user cannot just
easily set LESS in his environment, with a minimum set of options, and
git's use of less will continue flawlessly out of the box, as the -R
would be missing.

Let me repeat that it isn't the job of git or any other pager-enabled utility to fix the user-defined environment. Otherwise, the user actually wouldn't be able to make their choice freely.

Again, not the way the whole thing with pagination works.  If someone
sets their environment variables wrong, it's simply the way they want
it, and it isn't anyone else's business to attempt fixing it
automatically.

Well, I wouldn't agree with that.
LESS foremost a env var to configure less (surprise ^^).

If git (or anyone else) uses less internally, e.g. because they don't
want to implement their own pager, fine... but then they cannot just
blindly assume that LESS is set only for git's (or any other tool's
needs).

You seem to be missing the presence of other enviroment variables, namely $GIT_PAGER, which I already described in detail in my previous reply. I'd appreciate if you'd read that description in detail, and possibly test it a bit.

So I'd say the proper way is rather that any such tool makes sure, that
any options strictly required as set no matter what. Just as e.g. delta
does.

Again, that's simply wrong and defeats the user's freedom of choice.

Well, fragile or not, that's the way it works.  It has its downsides
for
sure, but it's all about having each utility handle the environment
carefully and document it in its man page(s), so the users can also
carefully craft the values of their customized environment variables.

Sure, but from a user's view, the use of less (or anything else) within
git is conceptually completely opaque.

Actually, it isn't, because there are $LESS, $PAGER and $GIT_PAGER environment variables to customize the behavior.

In less' manpage LESS isn't documented as "oh and you must make sure -R
is included or otherwise git will break"...

Quite frankly, it would be silly to expect the less(1) man page to mention something about git(1).

$LESS can be seen as a global set of the common options for less(1),

o.O ... but, as I've described, one cannot really use it as that:

If I globally set e.g. LESS="F" because my desire is to make less
always exit as soon as the file fits on a screen, which I think is a
reasonable thing to do, git would no longer add "R" and output would
break.

Again, you seem not to understand well the distinction between the global settings (i.e. $LESS and $PAGER) and the utility-specific settings (e.g. $GIT_PAGER). Or you maybe simply refuse to understand it, I don't know.

You don't have to define an alias, there's $GIT_PAGER for that
purpose, as I already explained above.

Well, yes... and as I've said before, one could also solve it via
git_config... but the problem stays the same... as soon as someone
wants to use LESS as global less options just as you described it
yourself, git will no longer worker properly because of the missing -R.

And actually if one would use GIT_PAGER one would again defeat the
purpose of a allegedly global options LESS, because unless one does
something like GIT_PAGER="${LESS}R" it wouldn't see any changes made to
LESS.

Let me clarify that the contents of $LESS is applied by less(1) internally, so the final runtime configuration for less(1) is a sum of the configurations made available through the $LESS and $PAGER (or $GIT_PAGER) environment variables. It's a rather powerful approach, if used properly.

Moreover, the whole idea of the various utilities touching the $LESS
variable internally is to provide sane defaults to the users that
don't
configure $LESS, $PAGER, etc. on their own.

Then I don't see what the big problem would be to just do it via a
command argument - if someone really has ever some reasons to remove --
RAW‐CONTROL‐CHARS from the command options when less is invoked via git
... then he could still go into git_config and set that manually.

But it would seem to me that the overall handling would be much more
what one expects, than when doing the same via LESS.

Again, adding or modifying any command-line arguments by git itself would defeat the purpose of the environment variables and prevent the users from making their choice of the pagination configuration freely.

I don't know what delta is and how it actually paginates its outputs,
but it should follow the rules of the environment-based pager
configuration that I described in detail above.

Well, AFAIU, it doesn't and for good reasons :-)

In that case, delta does it wrong, and I hope you understand why.

Anyway... I think all necessary things have been said and this thread
has grown far to large with only semi-related stuff... so thanks for
all the replies why git uses "-X".

I hope all this was useful to you.  It was useful to me. :)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux