On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 07:50:31PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > All makes sense. I have a mild preference for "missing or corrupt" over > "missing or corrupted", but it's mild enough that I wouldn't be sad if > you kept it as-is ;-). Hmm, now I wonder which is grammatically more appropriate. According to the internet (which is never wrong), the distinction is generally one of intrinsic corrupt state versus something that has become corrupted. So I guess it depends on whether the file was created corrupt by a bug or corrupted by a hard disk failure. ;) I do not have a strong preference myself. The commits went into next already, but I think you also pointed out that many of these could be marked for translation (though this one is already). So we could do one or two patches to adjust the error messages on top. -Peff
