Re: [PATCH 1/1] [OUTREACHY] Fixed add.c file to conform to guidelines when using die() listed in issue #635

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Naomi Ibe <naomi.ibeh69@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thank you very much! I'd definitely make those changes on my next patch.

[administrivia] do not top post.

> Should I begin work on version 2 or should I still wait for additional
> input on the version 1?

There is no "rule", but based on observations on how people behave,
e.g.

 * for a small patch like this that can be given a good review in 10
   minutes or so, those who do not do so within the first 3 days
   will probably not do so.

 * once a reasonably thorough review is given, those who haven't
   responded to the patch and do not have much else to say are
   unlikely to respond.

 * on the other hand, after such a review is given, those who do not
   agree with the review tend to respond rather quickly, to get
   their voice in before it becomes too late.

I would say it would be good to start working on it right away and
use a couple of days reviewing it yourself before posting it.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux