Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2023, #03; Fri, 6)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:20:02AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * tb/repack-max-cruft-size (2023-10-05) 4 commits
>>   (merged to 'next' on 2023-10-06 at b3ca6df3b9)
>>  + builtin/repack.c: avoid making cruft packs preferred
>>  + builtin/repack.c: implement support for `--max-cruft-size`
>>  + builtin/repack.c: parse `--max-pack-size` with OPT_MAGNITUDE
>>  + t7700: split cruft-related tests to t7704
>>
>>  "git repack" learned "--max-cruft-size" to prevent cruft packs from
>>  growing without bounds.
>>
>>  Will merge to 'master'.
>>  source: <cover.1696293862.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  source: <035393935108d02aaf8927189b05102f4f74f340.1696370003.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks. On a semi-related note, did you want to pick up my patch in
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/git/035393935108d02aaf8927189b05102f4f74f340.1696370003.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> ? That should address a performance bug that occurs when a repository
> (incorrectly) chooses a cruft pack as its preferred pack source when
> writing a MIDX bitmap, significantly impeding the pack-reuse mechanism.

Isn't that in the above list already as b3ca6df3b9^2?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux