On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:26:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > This test has never leaked since it was added. Let's annotate it to make > sure it stays that way (and to reduce noise when looking for other > leak-free scripts after we fix some leaks). > > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> > --- > Obviously not directly related to the rest; this could be spun off to > its own series, or put atop jk/tree-name-and-depth-limit and merged from > there. I wondered how I missed this in tb/mark-more-tests-as-leak-free, but the answer is trivial: that topic preceded your tree depth stuff ;-). This change makes good sense, and I don't think it's worth spinning off into its own series. Thanks, Taylor
