just language nits on the commit message: On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:58:43AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Not supporting commits, tags, or trees has no downside as it is not currently supported now, and commits, tags, and trees being smaller by design do not have the problem that the problem that index_bulk_checkin
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ duplicated!
was built to solve.
A version of index_bulk_checkin that supports more than just blobs when computing both the SHA-1 and the SHA-256 of every object added would need a different, and more expensive structure. The structure is more expensive because it would be required to temporarily buffering the
^^^ no 'ing' here.
equivalent object the compatibility hash needs to be computed over.
A temporary object is needed, because before a hash over an object can computed it's
"be computed, its"
object header needs to be computed. One of the members of
regards
