On 2007-10-25 21:48:08 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Do we want to:
>
> - implement a mechanism for checking beforehand that the operation
> will not fail? Seems awkward to duplicate checks already found
> elsewhere.
Duplication is bad. Calling the same verification function more times
than necessary is still bad, but maybe not so bad that it wouldn't be
OK.
> - wait for proper transactions so we can rollback on error ?
Yes, this is what we should aim for. I'm working on code that'll
eventually give us this if it pans out.
> - on clone error, delete the newly-created stack ? I'd vote for this
> one, until the previous one gets done.
Seems reasonable.
> => is there any particular reason why we would refuse "+" ?
Not that I can think of at the moment, except maybe future-proofing.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
