Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I could revert and discard [4-6/6] of the previous iteration out of >> 'next' and have only the first three (which I thought have been >> adequately reviewed without remaining issues) graduate to 'master', >> if it makes it easier to fix this update on top, but I'd rather not >> to encourage people to form a habit of reverting changes out of >> 'next'. >> >> Thanks. > > I totally agree that reverting changes out of next is undesirable. I > will do a reroll on top of 'next' with only those incremental (new) > patches. OK, so the first 3 patches are now in 'master', and the remainder of the previous series have been discarded. Thanks.
