Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Linus Arver <linusa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Whatever improvements you have in mind, if they are >>> minor, letting the above graduate (they have been in 'next' for a >>> week without anybody complaining) and doing them as a follow-up >>> series would be sensible, I would think. >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Hmm, I don't think they are minor? See >> https://github.com/listx/git/tree/trailer-libification-prep for the >> current state of things. > > They do not look like "oops the patches I sent to the list was > totally bogus and they need replacing"; aren't they rather "these > are not yet complete and there are some of the follow-on work on top > of them"? Yes, precisely. >> I need to still follow up to your last comment on "trailer: rename >> *_DEFAULT enums to *_UNSPECIFIED" [2] (I was going to see if we needed >> the "obvious solution" as you described). >> >> If it's too painful to move this out of 'next' now, I'm OK with it >> graduating as is and doing a separate follow-up (I expect several more >> of these to happen anyway). Up to you. > > Let's mark the topic as "waiting for follow-up updates" and keep it > in 'next' until the follow-up patches become ready, then. Sounds good. >> Sorry for not noticing that this was in 'next' sooner and communicating >> accordingly. > > Gotchas happen. Let's try to communicate better the next time. > > Thanks. Thanks!
