Pratyush Yadav <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > In the past, git-gui has tried to keep backward compatibility with all > versions of Git, not just the latest ones. v2.36 is relatively new and > this code would not work for anyone using an older version of Git. > > I have largely followed this practice for all the code I have written > but I am not sure if it is a good idea to insist on it -- especially if > it would end up adding some more complexity. I would be interested to > hear what other people think about this. Good point. > Junio, I was under the impression that I would keep maintaining the tree > until we found a replacement maintainer. If you are okay with being the > interim maintainer, that sounds good to me. Let me know what works best. I am actually not OK ;-). I prefer to see somebody who does use git-gui, or at least somebody who uses Git in a graphical environment in their daily work, to be maintaining it. I am disqualified on both counts. > I have applied another patch since my last pull request. So I can apply > this one, send you a new one and sync our trees. OK. I'll drop the copy I have on my end when it happens, then. Thanks.
