Michael Strawbridge <michael.strawbridge@xxxxxxx> writes: > Whoops, somehow I missed the other responses on this thread until I > looked on the web archive version of this mailing list. I see that a > solution to "Use of uninitialized value $address" has already been proposed. > > I suppose I may have mistook what issue was being reported. I had > originally understood the problem to be that hook related logic was > failing with correct email addresses, but it seems rather that we are > trying to fix an error that occurs when an email address that fails > extract_valid_address_or_die() is given. Feel free to ignore my last > email if that is all we are trying to solve. I just had an impression that the original was complaining about the command failing, and the patches addressed a side issue that the error message that is given when the command fails uses an undefined value. The report was not quite clear what Bagas considerd a regression (e.g. did the command allow an invalid address like <pi@pi> but now it complains?), though.
