Final notes: - all of these were done on top of the current 'master' branch. Not that it likely matters much, but I thought I'd mention it in case there are conflicts with anything currently cooking in 'next'. I didn't even check. - The commits depend on each other, but apart from the ordering, they all stand on their own. They pass the test-suite at all stages. - In particular, the first four commits are cleanups and infrastructure that really is totally independent of the last two. I'd argue that the first one (the dependency fix) could/should be merged into stable, and the next three can probably be merged more aggressively than the last two. - I *think* this series is good to go. I've used the new rename detection code in my own "production" environment (ie the kernel) since sending it out, and the end result of all these patches is identical - apart from the the dependency fix - to what I've been running for the last week. But maybe it makes more sense to merge the first four into 'next', and leave the last two in 'pu', for example (or 'master' and 'next' respectively, depending on how comfy people are with the patches). Splitting the thing up definitely makes the series more readable, and maybe that means that somebody will actually comment on it. I don't think I got any comments on the original series once I fixed the stupid bugs. Hopefully the cleaner series is more amenable to people reviewing it. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
