When there is:
- at least one pre-existing packfile (which is not marked as kept),
- repacking with the `-d` flag, and
- not doing a cruft repack
, then we pass a handful of additional options to the inner
`pack-objects` process, like `--unpack-unreachable`,
`--keep-unreachable`, and `--pack-loose-unreachable`, in addition to
marking any packs we just wrote for promisor remotes as kept in-core
(with `--keep-pack`, as opposed to the presence of a ".keep" file on
disk).
Because we store both cruft and non-cruft packs together in the same
`existing.non_kept_packs` list, it suffices to check its `nr` member to
see if it is zero or not.
But a following change will store cruft- and non-cruft packs separately,
meaning this check would break as a result. Prepare for this by
extracting this part of the check into a new helper function called
`has_existing_non_kept_packs()`.
This patch does not introduce any functional changes, but prepares us to
make a more isolated change in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/repack.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c
index b5fb14c017..9ebc2e774b 100644
--- a/builtin/repack.c
+++ b/builtin/repack.c
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ struct existing_packs {
.non_kept_packs = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, \
}
+static int has_existing_non_kept_packs(const struct existing_packs *existing)
+{
+ return existing->non_kept_packs.nr;
+}
+
static void mark_packs_for_deletion_1(struct string_list *names,
struct string_list *list)
{
@@ -1047,7 +1052,8 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
if (pack_everything & ALL_INTO_ONE) {
repack_promisor_objects(&po_args, &names);
- if (existing.non_kept_packs.nr && delete_redundant &&
+ if (has_existing_non_kept_packs(&existing) &&
+ delete_redundant &&
!(pack_everything & PACK_CRUFT)) {
for_each_string_list_item(item, &names) {
strvec_pushf(&cmd.args, "--keep-pack=%s-%s.pack",
--
2.42.0.166.g68748eb9c8
