On 2023-09-12 19:11, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Someday, as a follow-up after the dust from this topic settles, we
would probably want to look at how these rev.diffopt.* members are
initialized and refactor the common code out to a helper. It would
allow us to instead of doing this ...
Another good point. If you agree, I'd prefer to have my patch
accepted and merged as-is, ...
That is exactly what I meant by "follow-up after the dust settles".
All of the "we should probably do this and that in the future" are
called #leftoverbits comments. Food for thought, something people
can use to find inspiration for areas they may want to work on, that
has no impact to how "complete" the current patch being discussed
is.
Sounds great, thank you. I already have a couple of code cleanups to
work on, which I'll do in the following days and send the patches.
