On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023, at 18:39, Sergey Organov wrote: <SNIP> > > > > As I see it, in fact a repository can have zero (i.e. bare repository) > > or one inline worktree, as well as zero or more attached worktrees. > > Ah, thank you. I felt like the glossary/nomenclature was missing a few > words and these ones seem to fill things in nicely. > Yes, I agree!! I like the nomenclature, I like the simple "zero (i.e. bare) or one inline worktree, zero or more attached worktrees" explanation.
