"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But not with “worktree”: > > “ A repository can have zero (i.e. bare repository) or one or more > worktrees attached to it. ... > > Since this entry claims that “bare repository” and “zero worktrees” are > equivalent. I wrote that "(i.e. bare repository)" in 2df5387e (glossary: describe "worktree", 2022-02-09) but did not mean that way. A non-bare repository can reduce the number of its worktrees, but it cannot go below one, because the directory with working tree files and the .git/ subdirectory, i.e. its primary worktree, must exist for it to be a non-bare repository. Consequently a repository with zero worktree is by definition a bare repository. But that does not have to mean all bare repositories can have no worktrees.
